Specific COVID-19 risk behaviors and the preventive effect of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in Japan

Summary As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in healthcare facilities are a serious public health concern, we performed a case-control study to investigate the risk of COVID-19 infection in healthcare workers. We collected data on participants' sociodemographic characteristics, contact behaviors, installation status of personal protective equipment, and polymerase chain reaction testing results. We also collected whole blood and assessed seropositivity using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and microneutralization assay. In total, 161 (8.5%) of 1,899 participants were seropositive between August 3 and November 13, 2020. Physical contact (adjusted odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1-5.6) and aerosol-generating procedures (1.9, 1.1-3.2) were associated with seropositivity. Using goggles (0.2, 0.1-0.5) and N95 masks (0.3, 0.1-0.8) had a preventive effect. Seroprevalence was higher in the outbreak ward (18.6%) than in the COVID-19 dedicated ward (1.4%). Results showed certain specific risk behaviors of COVID-19;proper infection prevention practices reduced these risks.

National seroepidemiological study of COVID-19 after the initial rollout of vaccines: Before and at the peak of the Omicron-dominant period in Japan.

Background: Based on routine surveillance data, Japan has been affected much less by COVID-19 compared with other countries. To validate this, we aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and examine sociodemographic factors associated with cumulative infection in Japan. Methods: A population-based serial cross-sectional seroepidemiological investigation was conducted in five prefectures in December 2021 (pre-Omicron) and February-March 2022 (Omicron [BA.1/BA.2]-peak). Anti-nucleocapsid and anti-spike antibodies were measured to detect infection-induced and vaccine/infection-induced antibodies, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between various factors and past infection. Results: Among 16 296 participants (median age: 53 [43-64] years), overall prevalence of infection-induced antibodies was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.9-2.5%) in December 2021 and 3.5% (95% CI: 3.1-3.9%) in February-March 2022. Factors associated with past infection included those residing in urban prefectures (Tokyo: aOR 3.37 [95% CI: 2.31-4.91], Osaka: aOR 3.23 [95% CI: 2.17-4.80]), older age groups (60s: aOR 0.47 [95% CI 0.29-0.74], 70s: aOR 0.41 [95% CI 0.24-0.70]), being vaccinated (twice: aOR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.28-0.61], three times: aOR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.12-0.36]), individuals engaged in occupations such as long-term care workers (aOR: 3.13 [95% CI: 1.47-6.66]), childcare workers (aOR: 3.63 [95% CI: 1.60-8.24]), food service workers (aOR: 3.09 [95% CI: 1.50-6.35]), and history of household contact (aOR: 26.4 [95% CI: 20.0-34.8]) or non-household contact (aOR: 5.21 [95% CI:3.80-7.14]) in February-March 2022. Almost all vaccinated individuals (15 670/15 681) acquired binding antibodies with higher titers among booster dose recipients. Conclusions: Before Omicron, the cumulative burden was >10 times lower in Japan (2.2%) compared with the US (33%), the UK (25%), or global estimates (45%), but most developed antibodies owing to vaccination.

National seroepidemiological study of COVID‐19 after the initial rollout of vaccines: Before and at the peak of the Omicron‐dominant period in Japan

Background Based on routine surveillance data, Japan has been affected much less by COVID‐19 compared with other countries. To validate this, we aimed to estimate SARS‐CoV‐2 seroprevalence and examine sociodemographic factors associated with cumulative infection in Japan. Methods A population‐based serial cross‐sectional seroepidemiological investigation was conducted in five prefectures in December 2021 (pre‐Omicron) and February–March 2022 (Omicron [BA.1/BA.2]‐peak). Anti‐nucleocapsid and anti‐spike antibodies were measured to detect infection‐induced and vaccine/infection‐induced antibodies, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between various factors and past infection. Results Among 16 296 participants (median age: 53 [43–64] years), overall prevalence of infection‐induced antibodies was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.9–2.5%) in December 2021 and 3.5% (95% CI: 3.1–3.9%) in February–March 2022. Factors associated with past infection included those residing in urban prefectures (Tokyo: aOR 3.37 [95% CI: 2.31–4.91], Osaka: aOR 3.23 [95% CI: 2.17–4.80]), older age groups (60s: aOR 0.47 [95% CI 0.29–0.74], 70s: aOR 0.41 [95% CI 0.24–0.70]), being vaccinated (twice: aOR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.28–0.61], three times: aOR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.12–0.36]), individuals engaged in occupations such as long‐term care workers (aOR: 3.13 [95% CI: 1.47–6.66]), childcare workers (aOR: 3.63 [95% CI: 1.60–8.24]), food service workers (aOR: 3.09 [95% CI: 1.50–6.35]), and history of household contact (aOR: 26.4 [95% CI: 20.0–34.8]) or non‐household contact (aOR: 5.21 [95% CI:3.80–7.14]) in February–March 2022. Almost all vaccinated individuals (15 670/15 681) acquired binding antibodies with higher titers among booster dose recipients. Conclusions Before Omicron, the cumulative burden was >10 times lower in Japan (2.2%) compared with the US (33%), the UK (25%), or global estimates (45%), but most developed antibodies owing to vaccination.

Vasovagal reactions after COVID-19 vaccination in Japan.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine administration started in February 2021 in Japan. As of December 2021, approximately 75% of the population aged ≥12 years had received two doses of vaccine. We conducted a study to investigate vasovagal reactions (VVR) after COVID-19 vaccination using data on adverse events following immunization. The crude reporting rate of VVR (cases/1,000,000 doses) after vaccination was 9.6 in all age groups combined, and was more frequent in the younger age groups: 28.6 and 37.2 in individuals aged 10-19 years and 20-29 years, respectively. In individuals aged 10-29 years, the rate was similar in males and females (33.0 and 34.2, respectively, p = 0.53); but was higher after dose 1 than after dose 2 (57.4 and 8.8, respectively, p < 0.001). Based on these results, caution needs to be exercised when vaccinating adolescents and young adults, especially with dose 1 of COVID-19 vaccines.